New evidence published by the Scientific Advisory Committee on Radio Frequency and Health (CCARS) in its 2016 Radio Frequency and Health Report indicates that there are no adverse health effects derived of exposure to radio frequencies emitted by mobile phone antennas or radio and television broadcasting.No evidence has been found on the danger in wireless systems (Wi-Fi) or airport scanners.
The new 2016 Radio Frequency and Health Report collects, updates and analyzes the scientific evidence on the subject for the period between January 2013 and June 2016.
radio frequencies are not dangerous
According to the conclusions of the report " the critical analysis of the evidence supports that there are no technical or sanitary reasons that justify the arbitrary and discretionary imposition of more demanding exposure limits than those recommended by WHO-ICNIRP and the Union European ", while the application of more restrictive limits" would imply increasing the number of antennas with the consequent visual, social and economic impact ".
The report also includes that " the levels of exposure of the population to radio frequencies of Wi-Fi devices, which are well studied under realistic operating conditions, are much lower than those recommended by agencies and committees Scientists ".
At the present time, the engineering aspects of the evaluation of EMF exposure to WLAN networks are complex, but they are well known and the various studies carried out have provided a correct understanding of the evaluation mechanisms and possible effects that these Wi-Fi devices produce on users.
The literature on biological effects is much more dispersed, both in quality and in the final objectives analyzed.Although some effects have been described, the technical limitations in the studies make them difficult to interpret.However, with existing literature so far, there is no scientific basis to anticipate any biological effect derived from Wi-Fi devices on the general public.
mobile and pacemaker
On the other hand, the new report of the CCARS affirms that " there is sufficient evidence to affirm that the use of the mobile phone is safe in the hospital environment provided that a safety distance of 1 meter between the medical devices used for patient surveillance and treatment "; while the use of the mobile phone " is safe for carriers of implantable devices (cardiac pacemaker), although a safety distance of 15 cm must be maintained.".
In relation to airport scanners, the report explains that " work with low power levels, low penetration and surface exposure, and the dosimetry performed shows that the exposure limits are much lower than those recommended as safe ".
The methodology used in the 200-page report prioritizes the best designed and high-quality studies for inclusion in the review process.These types of studies provide objective and relevant information to establish guidelines and recommendations on the effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on human health.
Observational studies that obtain information on the supposed risks of radio frequencies (mobile phone antennas and mobile phone use) through surveys and interviews are very numerous, and the results of these are often subjective and partial, but lack objective assessments of exposure to electromagnetic fields and are subject to numerous biases that invalidate their conclusions.
Comments
Post a Comment