Skip to main content

Are we willing to give up the "data for services" model?

Are we willing to give up the


Probably, only in the time that it will take you to read this article will dozens of attacks destined to steal personal and financial data of all kinds take place in the world.According to the Breach Level Index website, every day they are lost or stolen more than five million personal profiles, which means about 3,500 per minute.


One of the most important leaks in history took place in September last year, when Equifax, a provider of commercial and credit information, was affected almost 148 million accounts.The criminals managed to get postal addresses, numbers of cards of driving and financial profiles. Related


However, the most mediatic case, due to its importance in public life and its protagonists, was that of Facebook.More than 80 million accounts of the social network were used by the Cambridge Analytica data analysis firm, linked to the controversial Steve Bannon, ex-advisor to Donald Trump, for electoral purposes in the United States.As a result, Mark Zuckerberg himself had to give explanations to the US authorities and rethink the entire social network security policy.


Most bet on data exchange


It is worth asking if these cases are changing the perception that users have about the security of their personal information on the internet and if, in some way, they will jeopardize the “data for services” model that Google has imposed, Facebook or LinkedIn, among others, aware that the information is the "oil of the 21st century".


On a political level, Europe has reacted with the full entry into force of the General Data Protection Regulation, the famous GDPR, which hardens penalties for companies that do not properly protect their users' information and forces them to be more transparent and react earlier when a security breach occurs.


Are we willing to give up the


However, a study conducted in 10 countries by the Global Alliance of Data-Driven Marketing Associations (GDMA), which has been promoted in Spain by ICEMD, shows that user positions have barely moved and that in In general, they put the benefits of internet services before the security of your personal data.


Although 74% are worried to some extent about their safety online , just over half of the respondents (51%) in the 10 countries of the study decide on a case-by-case basis share your personal information, and always depending on the benefits obtained.In Spain and the US, the so-called "pragmatics" reach almost 60%.That is, despite the cultural differences, the differences in legislation between states and From the impact of the last massive thefts of information on the web, Internet users mostly accept the current model of "data for services." Specifically in Spain, where 1,054 users over 18 years were interviewed, 80% of Spanish consumers show predisposition to share your personal data with brands.


26% don't care about their data


But the study goes further.It shows that the issue of security is quite foreign to many people.On average, one in four consumers (26%) says they are "little worried" about the way they are collected and use their data.In countries such as Germany and the Netherlands, the "carefree" reach 34% and 35%, respectively.Meanwhile, in Spain, those with the least views, who are usually the youngest, were 19%.


On the other side of the balance are consumers who are not willing to provide their personal information, even in exchange for improvements in service, and who represent a little less than a quarter (23%).In countries like Argentina or Singapore, the reluctant are clearly below 20%.In Spain this group of Internet users, almost always made up of the oldest, is 22%.


Are we willing to give up the


Joost van Nispen, president of ICEMD, says that the acceptance of the exchange of data as part of a normal modern economy is something assumed by the majority.It also points out that there is still "a considerable gap across the world between what consumers really want and what companies offer them".


For his part, Chris Combemale, a member of the GDMA board, is convinced that in general "people understand the value of sharing their personal data as part of a modern economy." And he says that as we move forward it will be "a challenge" to see how companies can take advantage of this positive attitude of consumers so that the relationship of consumers with the data economy does not end with "a reluctant acceptance".


Companies benefit "disproportionately"


In Spain, 58% of respondents agree to consider the exchange of data and personal information online as part of the modern economy.However, these same Spanish consumers believe that companies benefit "disproportionately" of data exchange.Specifically, 87% of respondents believe that companies are the ones that benefit most from data exchange, while only 5% ensure that it is the consumers who get the most out of it.a worrying fact that can break the relationship of trust that exists mostly between providers and internet users.


And one last concern that the ICEMD study points out, and which precisely addresses the GDPR, is that of control over personal data when they become in the hands of companies, while the majority of Internet users in the world and in this country He has no problem in continuing to exchange personal data in exchange for services, if they care that this information finally comes to third parties.Yes, about half of those interviewed in Spain say they have little or no control to prevent companies exchange your personal data with other companies; In addition, an overwhelming majority of Spanish consumers (89%) would like more control over data exchanges and the way they are stored.


Images/iStock Oatawa/Filistimlyanin/ViewApart

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Internet of plants: a tomato knows as much about networks as you

The possibility of plant species communicating through complex networks, what some scientists have called the internet of plants , is an issue that has been discussed for a long time, at least 20 years.It was in 1997 when the scientist Suzanne Simard , from the University of British Columbia in Vancouver (Canada), published a study in the journal Nature on how Forest plants use complex systems where species exchange nutrients, send warning signals and relate to the environment. Although there is no scientific consensus, several investigations seem to support this hypothesis.If confirmed, as we read in a fascinating report by the Sinc Agency, the forests would act as huge structures that are articulated under the soil through a network in which factors invisible to the human eye interact and can determine the future of the climate.Understanding how it works is the challenge that even science faces. internet of plants and the wisdom of forests The premise of Suzanne Simard ...

New setbacks for conspiranoicos: radiofrequencies do not affect health

New evidence published by the Scientific Advisory Committee on Radio Frequency and Health (CCARS) in its 2016 Radio Frequency and Health Report indicates that there are no adverse health effects derived of exposure to radio frequencies emitted by mobile phone antennas or radio and television broadcasting.No evidence has been found on the danger in wireless systems (Wi-Fi) or airport scanners. The new 2016 Radio Frequency and Health Report collects, updates and analyzes the scientific evidence on the subject for the period between January 2013 and June 2016. radio frequencies are not dangerous According to the conclusions of the report " the critical analysis of the evidence supports that there are no technical or sanitary reasons that justify the arbitrary and discretionary imposition of more demanding exposure limits than those recommended by WHO-ICNIRP and the Union European ", while the application of more restrictive limits" would imply increasing the n...

GIF history: where they come from and where they are going

Funny, witty, curious... GIFs have already become a regular resource in social networks and messaging applications and have become part of our daily lives and jokes.It is an image format that has evolved significantly throughout its history and is experiencing a new awakening. In fact, to find its origins, we must go back more than twenty years ago .A moment in which they had little to do with what we know today and an evolution that we could not stop review.So let's find out where they come from and try to catch a glimpse of where they are going. What is a GIF The word GIF responds to the acronym of Graphics Interchange Format , or what is the same, graphic exchange format.A term for the graphic format used in the network for both static images and animations.In more concrete terms, it supports 8 bits per pixel and allows you to display images with up to 256 colors simultaneously-limited by a palette of 16 million-. This particularity makes it a perfect ally of infogr...

Amazon Prime Video arrives in Spain: this is all you need to know

That during the last years there has been a change in the way we enjoy audiovisual content is an obvious reality, as reflected by the huge popularity of streaming services like Netflix and the like.A context in which new competitors are constantly added and that, after the landing of this company in our country just over a year ago, is in full transformation. In fact, today we have learned of the incursion of a new protagonist in this area.Yes, because Amazon Prime Video has just arrived in Spain .A landing that takes place only two weeks away that of HBO, which culminates in a 2016 sown of changes.But, what exactly does it consist of? What advantages and disadvantages does it have compared to the "of its kind"? WHAT AMAZON PRIME VIDEO OFFERS The type, quality and quantity of movies and series offered by the service will be key when determining your success.A catalog a priori smaller than that of HBO and Netflix, but in which we find titles like Seinfield , Into...

What we know and what we suspect in the new Facebook algorithm change

"In my time, we read the newspaper in Facebook ".By 2020, nostalgia has taken over billions of people.In its memory, 2018, when Facebook stopped being Facebook to become Facebook again.Paraiso of engagement for brands and media, land paid for clickbaits and fake news, the social network of Mark Zuckerberg has given a rudder to his algorithm. He wants to return to his origins .And this is what will happen. Related If something goes well, to change it.40.653 million dollars entered in 2017.More than 2.100 million active users per month, a quarter of the world's population.But Zuckerberg is not one of those, of which they are.Want a Facebook with more social connections between people and less presence of brands and media .And what do your users want? Nearly two-thirds of American adults consume news on social networks.More than half do so on their Facebook walls.Pew Research Center data points to a clear trend: Facebook is becoming a media platform.54% of Facebook u...

No kidding: selfitis exists and can be a problem

Sometimes one thinks that social networks were created to share photos of faces putting on little bones and images of dishes overflowing with appetizing foods or, better, of faces putting little bones in front of plates overflowing with appetizing foods in the same shot.is to see faces, faces, faces...all of them smiling, as if looking at the smartphone mirror was the height of happiness.And it does not seem that there are so many beautiful and happy people, or maybe yes, that you go Namely.What envy. Well, what we're going to do: Janarthanan Balakrishnan psychologists from the Thiagarajar School of Management in India; and Mark D.Griffiths, of the Nottingham Trent University, in the United Kingdom, have published an article in the International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction entitled 'A study on' Selfitis', which names this mania of going around the world taking pictures of oneself, as if beyond our curls the world had been destroyed by that meteorite th...

Twitter shows the best of ourselves (it wasn't always going to be the worst)

In the era of social networks, accustomed to interact daily with Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Google or WhatsApp, we forget that these tools are phenomenal in the History of Humanity capable of mobilize hundreds of thousands of people in very different geographical locations in a matter of hours or even minutes. Already in the past, Twitter has asserted its more social dimension to mobilize people, companies or organizations and also, from a broader perspective, feelings of solidarity and support or also of rejection and repulses towards causes with an important mediatic impact.Recently, Twitter was once again the engine of solidarity after Dortmund's explosions as the Borussia Dortmund team bus passed on its way to the local stadium on the occasion of the Champions League match between the Borussia and the Monaco. These explosions did not have the devastating effect that they could have caused , so that everything remained in a major social commotion at international lev...

Most apps for children violate your privacy

Do you know if apps with which children enjoy their safety? A team of researchers from the International Computer Science Institute (ICSI) of the University of Berkeley has studied compliance with the Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) in these mobile applications for the little ones, through a scalable dynamic analysis that allows the automatic evaluation of privacy behaviors of Android apps. After studying 5,855 applications aimed at children, the research concludes that most of these apps, 57%, violate the privacy of their users mainly due to the use of data by third parties. apps for children and privacy Although many apps offer options in their configuration to respect the federal law that protects minors in the United States, by disabling tracking, their results suggest that a majority of applications either do not use these options or propagate them in wrong way. In addition, researchers believe that 19% of apps for children send user IDs to third parties to show ...

Are social networks damaging democracy?

The revelations according to which Russian agents inserted ads on Facebook that tried to influence the 2016 US elections raise a disturbing question: is Facebook bad for democracy? As an expert in the social and political repercussions of technology, I think that the problem is not exclusively from Facebook, but that it is much broader: Social networks are weakening some of the conditions that have historically enabled the existence of national states democratic. I understand that it is a dramatic statement, and I do not expect anyone to believe it immediately, but considering that almost half of all potential voters received false news promoted by the Russians in Facebook is an argument that must be debated. Associate Professor of Philosophy, Director of Center for Professional and Applied Ethics, University of North Carolina-Charlotte How we create a shared reality Let's start with two concepts: the "imagined community" and the "bubble filter". ...

This is how visual challenges star in some of the most viral content

Constantly, we all receive in our mail, our WhatsApp or our Facebook account, games that try to test our ingenuity, imagination or visual skill.There are a thousand types, more fun or darker.But they have one thing in common: we cannot avoid trying them and see if we are able to solve them .This is how the visual challenges star in some of the most viral content of the network. Visual challenges, why are we crazy? The visual challenges are games.So, they attend to this playful and fun part that people have no choice but to feed from time to time.They are pure and hard entertainment, with no more pretensions, and that desire to Having fun represents one of the main features that are sought when surfing the Internet . Another of the qualities for which they succeed is because they challenge the mind directly.Human beings love that feeling of feeling a little troubled, somewhat lost, but convinced that there is a solution to that enigma to which, sooner or later, it will come.Rathe...